LeadUCore Principles (Draft: 062021)

Just as an update to where I am in this process 11.11.20; updated 6.14.21

1. The ultimate goal of LEADU must be to help people have lives—Generati.

2. Since most people are in the developing world, leadu will serve that development.

3. Leadership Basics: while leaders lead without basic managerial leadership skills, leadership is usually limited without basics, at minimum, haunting.

4. Leadu must develop a core leaderpath from basic to complex as Generati through a levelling approach.

5. Leadu must reconfigure (for itself) how people pay and earn while modelling that process.

6. Basics could be free, paying it forward a standard leading to an accumulation of leadership currency which can be used in more complex courses, certification and licensing.

7. Ability to pay should be removed with a leaderpath provided to those who demonstrate resolve, possibly through crowdfunding to take the pressure off leadu to provide all funding.

8. Alumni of leadu (in any form or at any level of achievement—even one course) should provide enabling and affiliating messaging to others and thus would receive referral currency which could be used to pay for classes and life’s basics: food, shelter, medicine, education and income.

9. Graduates must lead and define success and the core leadu intention to help people have sustainable  lives.

10. Leaders should not lose sight of the core intention of leadership…helping people have lives.

11. INBETWEENNESS

“…the extraordinary space in between the opposites based on a paradigm in cultural sociology that conceives of ambivalence and inbetweenness as a fundamental and indissoluble given of classification and interpretation.

More specifically, it considers something that transcends the sucessful ordering and splitting of the world into neat binaries, arguing that this inbetweenness is essential for the construction of culture.

Reality does not provide any firm ground for neat classification.

Therefore, in applying classifications to raw reality, there will always be an unclassifiable remainder.

Furthermore, in specifying meaning, there is no way to achieve absolute clarity and to avoid a rest of fuzziness.” — Abstracted from: Inbetweenness and Ambivalence By Bernhard Giesen