TPOVs @F-L-O-W
Employment to Involvement
Here is what I mean about solving
the wrong problems:
To create lasting growth in our
economy, we need steady domestic demand. For that to happen,
we need clarity when it comes to personal finances (taxes,
health, energy, etc.). We need to reign in the wild
debt-fueled spending of our government. We need the Federal
Reserve to get out of the rate-setting business and the
money-printing game.
Until those things happen, tepid demand will keep us in a
pattern of tepid employment… and changes in statistics like
U.S. jobless claims will simply be noise.
THIS assumes ceteris paribus that "lasting growth" is
the endgame.
IT IS @BS, it is NOT @F-L-O-W and beyond, IMHO.
I realize this introduces a can of worms few are willing to
consider eating… BUT…
This entire conception of infinity, eternality, and growth are
all centered in the same fallacy which says that the only way
to win is not to play…
Now, one can question the gambit of winning for sure… AND
The question is, if not growth (which happens organically),
what is the endgame…
And recently, I have wondered if switching from "full
employment" to "full involvement" is more than a semantical
shift to replace the endgame that is struggling against the
tension of infinity and eternality… or growth as you might
conclude — where reality is depicted by a perspective from a
level, not the truth which is constantly shifting….
A SHIFT FROM EMPLOYMENT to INVOLVEMENT
…seems more practical to me, in light of the shift of
assumptions in reality @F-L-O-W.
Involvement might mean SOME work, and SOME don’t.
OMG!
You mean some people get a "FREE RIDE" on the backs of others?
Hmmmm.
Well, some will define it that way, and as we push up against
conventionality, most people will refuse to embrace the
changes, and the destructive forces of change will act on
them.
For those wishing perhaps to have a different set of problems,
INVOLVEMENT rather than EMPLOYMENT might provide a different
ground for the figure of policy.
Helpful Hint: Moving from full employment to
full involvement will require us to rethink, and redesign how
we view the human condition and the goals for humanity.
Action Step: Consider if you will, suspending
your ideas that everyone should work… in the formal sense,
and if they didn’t how would society involve them.
If you have any comments, questions, suggestions, or need some additional help, please use the form below to submit them. Someone will get back to you within 48 hours. Or if you prefer, at the bottom of this page leave your comment and someone will get back to you.
We hope you pick up valuable insights, ideas, and
tools during this process, which you can use for your own development as
well as your work and leadership with others.
You, Me, and We @F-L-O-W
Mike R. Jay is a developmentalist utilizing consulting, coaching, mentoring and advising as methods to offer developmental scaffolding for aspiring leaders who are interested in being, doing, having, becoming, and contributing… to helping people have lives.
© Generati
Learn how you may become a member of our Inner Circle and receive the cutting edge on the most current thinking in Leader Development. Visit Inner Circle Membership.